Introduction

Have you ever wondered why your smartphone screen feels smoother, thinner, and more responsive than models from a few years ago? That’s thanks to rapid innovations in touch integration technologies. From the early days of external touch panels to the sophisticated Dans la cellule et Sur cellule methods, these advancements have redefined how we interact with our devices.

Let’s explore how Dans la cellule, Sur cellule, and OGS (One Glass Solution) evolved, ce qui les différencie, and how they’re merging to create the ultimate display experience.

The Evolution of Touchscreen Integration

Touchscreen technology started with a simple goal — to let users control devices directly through the display. Early smartphones used external touch modules, where the touch sensor was placed on top of the display. But as users demanded thinner phones and clearer screens, manufacturers sought better solutions.

Le résultat? A series of integration milestones — Sur cellule, OGS, et Dans la cellule — each merging touch and display layers more tightly than before.

Understanding Different Touchscreen Structures

External Touch Module (Add-On Type)

The earliest smartphones, like the first-generation iPhone, used separate touch modules. A glass layer with a touch sensor sat above the LCD.

Pros:

• Easy to produce and repair
• Reliable for early capacitive designs

Inconvénients:

• Thicker structure
• Reduced light transmittance (dimmer display)
• Lower sensitivity due to multiple layers

This setup worked fine until consumers started craving sleeker designs and better visual quality.

On-Cell Technology

Sur cellule embeds the touch sensor directly on top of the display panel, rather than on a separate layer.

How It Works:
Touch electrodes are patterned onto the outer glass of the display, reducing layers and improving light transmission.

Advantages:

• Thinner and lighter than external modules
• Improved optical clarity
• Good balance between cost and performance

Limitations:

• Difficult to achieve perfect touch accuracy on curved or edge designs
• Still has a small gap between the touch sensor and display pixels

Many mid-range and upper-mid smartphones adopted this as a stepping stone toward full integration.

In-Cell Technology

Dans la cellule represents the next evolution — integrating touch sensors directly into the display’s cell structure.

How It Works:
Touch electrodes are embedded within the TFT or LCD layer itself, meaning the touch sensing happens where images are formed.

Benefits:

• Ultra-thin design — no need for extra glass or layers
• Better light transmission — brighter and clearer images
• Higher sensitivity — direct response to touch with less delay
• Fewer layers — reduced weight and better production efficiency

This is why flagship models like the iPhone and premium Androids rely heavily on In-Cell or hybrid In-Cell solutions.

OGS (One Glass Solution)

Before In-Cell matured, OGS was introduced as a bridge technology.

What It Is:
OGS integrates the touch sensor directly on a single piece of glass, removing one substrate layer compared to older designs.

Pros:

• Lighter and thinner than traditional add-on structures
• Easier to manufacture than In-Cell in early stages

Inconvénients:

• Fragile due to thinner glass
• Still not as integrated as In-Cell

OGS found popularity in early 2010s smartphones, especially in cost-sensitive markets.

Technological Comparison

Thickness and Design

Touch Sensitivity and Accuracy

In-Cell outperforms others by detecting even the lightest touches due to its embedded sensors. On-Cell remains accurate but slightly less responsive.

Qualité d'affichage

With fewer layers blocking light, In-Cell delivers superior luminosité, précision des couleurs, et contraste.

Manufacturing Complexity and Cost

While In-Cell offers top performance, it’s more complex to produce — making it costlier and harder to maintain high yield rates during mass production.

In-Cell Technology — The Game Changer

How In-Cell Works

By merging the touch and display electrodes, In-Cell eliminates redundant layers. The display’s TFT array drives both image pixels and touch sensing, allowing faster processing and better visual consistency.

Advantages of In-Cell

• Diluant, lighter devices — essential for modern designs
• Sharper visuals — fewer layers mean less refraction
• More sensitive touch — immediate signal detection
• Energy efficiency — less backlight power needed

Technical Challenges

Despite its strengths, In-Cell faces issues like:

• Signal interference between display and touch circuits
• Lower production yields
• Compatibility limits with flexible OLED panels (though improving fast)

The Rise of Hybrid Technologies

In-Cell and On-Cell Integration

Manufacturers are experimenting with hybrid designs, merging On-Cell’s flexibility with In-Cell’s efficiency. This approach improves production yield while retaining most benefits of In-Cell integration.

The Role of OLED and LTPO

As OLED and LTPO displays dominate premium markets, new Touch-on-OLED (ToF) et Integrated OLED Touch solutions have emerged — offering ultra-fast response times and low power consumption.

Market Trends and Future Outlook

Des marques comme Pomme, Samsung, Xiaomi, et Oppo are driving In-Cell and OLED touch innovations. Foldable phones, caméras sous-jeu, and curved edges push manufacturers toward fully integrated designs that balance flexibility, durabilité, et sensitivity.

In the near future, touch and display will become virtually indistinguishable, delivering seamless interactivity — almost like touching light itself.

Conclusion

From external modules to In-Cell integration, touch technology has come a long way. In-Cell stands as the most advanced, combining thinness, clarity, and responsiveness — the holy trinity of modern smartphone screens.

As displays evolve toward flexible, pliable, and under-screen solutions, In-Cell’s fusion of performance and design will remain the foundation for the next wave of interactive innovation.

FAQ

1. What is the main difference between On-Cell and In-Cell?
On-Cell places touch sensors above the display, while In-Cell embeds them within the display’s layers for thinner and more responsive results.

2. Why is In-Cell more popular in flagship smartphones?
Because it offers the best combination of slim design, visual clarity, and touch precision.

3. What are the limitations of OGS technology?
OGS panels are thinner but more fragile and less integrated compared to In-Cell.

4. Will In-Cell replace all other touch technologies?
Likely for high-end devices, though On-Cell and hybrid solutions will remain in budget or flexible applications.

5. How does OLED affect touch integration?
OLED panels naturally support built-in touch sensors, paving the way for advanced In-Cell and hybrid In-Display technologies.